NUCLEATION LABORATORY
THE EFFECT OF CARRIER GAS PRESSURE AND WALL HEATING
ON THE OPERATION OF THE THERMAL DIFFUSION CLOUD CHAMBER
accepted for publication in J. Chem. Phys.2001
F.T.
Ferguson and R.H. Heist
RESEARCH
SUMMARY
In this paper we report new results in which
existing nucleation data from the literature has been re-examined using a more
refined model of cloud chamber operation. Experimental
observations indicate that the nucleation behavior within the thermal diffusion
cloud chamber (TDCC) changes with increasing carrier gas pressure and applied
sidewall heating, even though such an effect is not predicted by typical
nucleation theories or is it seen in typical low pressure, expansion-based
nucleation studies. In this work we
present a model of the chamber that shows that both of these effects are likely
due (in large part, at least) to buoyancy-induced convection within the TDCC.
Using this model, we are able to show that as the chamber total pressure
is increased, the calculated critical supersaturation within the chamber
actually decreases. Supersaturation and
temperature conditions for an experiment carried out in our laboratory involving
the high pressure cloud chamber (HPCC) and 1-propanol in helium background gas
as predicted by our current model for vapor and mass transport are shown
below. Also shown below are the radial and axial velocity components of
the overall motion in the HPCC. Positive velocity values
denote motion upward (axial) and to the right (radial). Wall heat was not
used during this experiment.
Additional results obtained by using a simple model describing the chamber wall heating are also presented. Previously, it was argued that unheated chamber walls result in a significant, radial concentration gradient that lowers the vapor concentration and condensation flux within the chamber center. In contrast, we show that this reduction is due primarily to a convective flow disturbance induced by the sidewall concentration gradient. This model has been applied to recent experimental data for 1-pentanol. Results indicate that, with respect to buoyancy-induced convection, the typical one-dimensional model used to describe vapor and energy transport in the TDCC should be regarded as an upper limit to the maximum attainable supersaturation within the chamber.
| Contour plots for the wet wall HPCC at 1.18 bar |
![]() |
![]() |
| SUPERSATURATION | TEMPERATURE |
![]() |
![]() |
| RADIAL VELOCITY COMPONENT | AXIAL VELOCITY COMPONENT |
| Professor Heist's Publications |
| Professor Heist's Home Page |